| ISSN: | 1640-1808 |
Different methods – lasting tensions: exploring familial pragmatism through a methodological lens
1
SWPS University
2
University of Warsaw
Online publication date: 2023-12-12
Publication date: 2023-12-12
Corresponding author
Paula Pustułka
Institute of Social Sciences, SWPS University, ul. Chodakowska 19/31, 03-815, Warsaw,
Institute of Social Sciences, SWPS University, ul. Chodakowska 19/31, 03-815, Warsaw,
Problemy Polityki Społecznej 2023;62(3):1-13
REFERENCES (64)
1.
Adams, B. (2010). Themes and Threads of Family Theories: A Brief History, Journal of Comparative Family Studies, vol.41(4):499-505.
2.
Allan, G. (ed.) (1999). The Sociology of the Family. A Reader. Malden, MA, USA & Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
4.
Belsky, J. (1984). The determinants of parenting: A process model. Child development, 83-96.
5.
Bernardes, J. (1985). Do we really know what “the family” is? In: P Close & R Collins (eds.) Family and economy in modern society. London: The MacMillan Press.
6.
Billari, Francesco C., & Aart C. Liefbroer. "Why still marry? The role of feelings in the persistence of marriage as an institution 1. The British journal of sociology 67.3 (2016): 516-540.
7.
Bredemeier, H. (1955). The methodology of functionalism. American Sociological Review, 20(2), 173-180.
8.
Bucholc, M. (2022). Abortion law and human rights in Poland: The closing of the jurisprudential horizon. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 14(1), 73-99.
9.
Cano, T., & Hofmeister, H. (2023). The intergenerational transmission of gender: Paternal influences on children's gender attitudes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 85(1), 193-214.
10.
Casper, L. M., & Bianchi, S. M. (2001). Continuity and change in the American family. Sage Publications.
11.
Chambers, D. (2012). A Sociology of Family Life. Changes and Diversity in Intimate Relations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12.
Chang, K.S. (1997). Modernity through the family: familial foundations of Korean society. International Review of Sociology, 7(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/039067... .9971221.
14.
Chodorow, N. (1976). The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender, Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
15.
Dermott, E. (2014). Intimate fatherhood: A sociological analysis. London: Routledge.
16.
Dermott, E. & Seymour, J. (red.) (2011). Displaying Families. A New Concept for the Sociology of Family Life. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
Ehrenreich, B. (2011). The hearts of men: American dreams and the flight from commitment. Anchor.
18.
Farrell, B., VandeVusse, A., & Ocobock, A. (2012). Family change and the state of family sociology. Current Sociology, 60(3), 283-301.
20.
Firestone, S. (1970). The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. Verso Books.
21.
Furlong, A. (2015). Transitions, cultures, and identities: What is youth studies?. In Youth cultures, transitions, and generations: Bridging the gap in youth research (pp. 16-27). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
22.
Gabb, J. (2011). Troubling displays: The affect of gender, sexuality and class. IN: E. Dermott, & J. Seymour (red.), Displaying Families. A New Concept for the Sociology of Family Life (pp. 38–57). Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
Gabb, J., & Fink, J. (2017). Couple relationships in the 21st century: Research, policy, practice. Springer.
24.
Gawrońska, M. & Sikorska, M. (2022). Rodziny na widoku – koncepcja demonstrowania rodzinności jako narzędzie użyteczne do analizowania życia rodzinnego. Studia Socjologiczne, 1(244), 137–164.
25.
Gerodetti, N., & Mottier, V. (2009). Feminism (s) and the politics of reproduction: Introduction to Special Issue onFeminist Politics of Reproduction'. Feminist Theory, 10(2), 147-152.
26.
Giddens A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies, Stanford University Press.
27.
Heaphy, B. (2011). Critical relational displays, w: E. Dermott, J. Seymour (red.), Displaying Families. A New Concept for the Sociology of Family Life (s. 19–37). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
Iacovou, M., & Skew, A. J. (2011). Household composition across the new Europe: Where do the new Member States fit in?. Demographic research, 25, 465-490.
30.
Jamieson, L. (1998). Intimacy: personal relationships in modern societies. Polity Press.
31.
Katz Rothman, B. (1989). Recreating Motherhood. Ideology and Technology in a Patriarchal Society, New York: W.W. Norton & Company Ltd.
32.
Keilman, N. (1988). Recent trends in family and household composition in Europe. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 297-325.
33.
Kramer, A. (2010). Defending Biomedical Authority and Regulating the Womb as Social Space: Prenatal Testing in the Polish Press, European Journal of Women's Studies , vol.17(1): 43- 59.
34.
Mann, Grimes, Kemp & Jenkins 1997 Mann, S. A., Grimes, M. D., Kemp, A. A., & Jenkins, P. J. (1997). Paradigm shifts in family sociology? Evidence from three decades of family textbooks. Journal of Family Issues, 18(3), 315-349.
37.
Mizielińska, J., Struzik, J., & Król, A. (2017). Różnym głosem: rodziny z wyboru w Polsce. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
40.
Murdock, G. (1949). Social Structure. New York–London: The Free Press–Collier-Macmillan Limited.
41.
Mynarska, M., & Rytel, J. (2014). Pomiar motywacji do posiadania dzieci wśród osób bezdzietnych. Polska adaptacja kwestionariusza motywów rodzicielskich, Polskie Forum Psychologiczne, 19(4): 522-543.
42.
Neale, B. (2020). Qualitative longitudinal research: Research methods. Bloomsbury Publishing.
43.
Okin, S. M. (1989). Reason and feeling in thinking about justice. Ethics, 99(2), 229-249.
44.
Pahl, R., & Spencer, L. (2004). Personal Communities: Not Simply Families of ‘Fate’ or ‘Choice’. Current Sociology, 52(2), 199-221.
45.
Parsons, T. & Bales, R.F. (1955). Family Socialization and Interaction Process. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.
46.
Platt, J. (1986). Functionalism and the survey: the relation of theory and method. The Sociological Review, 34(3), 501-536.
47.
Pustułka, P., & Sikorska, M. (2023). Familial pragmatism: modern families navigating the private/public junction. Problemy Polityki Społecznej, 61(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.31971/pps/1....
48.
Radzińska, J. & Pustułka, P. (2022). Pandemiczne święta: typologia postaw Polek i Polaków wobec zmian w praktykach rodzinnych w kryzysie w świetle danych jakościowych. Roczniki Nauk Społecznych, 14(50), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.18290/rns22....
49.
Rancew-Sikora, D., & Żadkowska, M. (2017). Receiving guests at home by nationally mixed couples: the case of Polish females and Norwegian males. Studia Migracyjne-Przegląd Polonijny, 43(4): 61-86.
50.
Ribbens McCarthy, J., Gillies, V., & Hooper, C.-A. (2013). Family troubles? Exploring changes and challenges in family lives of children and young people. The Policy Press.
51.
Rich, A. (1976). Of Woman Born. Motherhood as Experience and Institution, London and New York: Norton.
52.
Savage, M. (2009). Contemporary sociology and the challenge of descriptive assemblage. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1): 155-174.
53.
Sikorska, M. (2019). Praktyki rodzinne i rodzicielskie we współczesnej Polsce - rekonstrukcja codzienności. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
54.
Slany, K. (2013). W mozaice zagadnień życia małżeńsko-rodzinnego: wprowadzenie, w: K Slany (red.) Zagadnienia małżeństwa i rodzin w perspektywie feministyczno-genderowej. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. pp. 7-30.
55.
Slany, K., Ślusarczyk, M., Pustułka, P., & Guribye, E. (2018). Transnational Polish families in Norway: social capital, integration, institutions and care. Berlin: Peter Lang.
56.
Smart, C. (2007). Personal Life. New Directions in Sociological Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Szlendak, T. (2010). Socjologia rodziny: Ewolucja, Historia, Zróżnicowanie, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
58.
Therborn, G. (2004). Between Sex and Power: Family in the world 1900-2000. London: Routledge.
59.
Uzuegbunam, C. E., & Udeze, S. (2013). Sensationalism in the media: the right to sell or the right to tell. Journal of Communication and Media Research, 5(1), 69-78.
61.
Vogl, S., Schmidt, E. M., & Zartler, U. (2019). Triangulating perspectives: ontology and epistemology in the analysis of qualitative multiple perspective interviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(6), 611-624.
62.
Walker, A. (1991). The relationship between the family and the state in the care of older people. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, 10(2), 94-112.
63.
Weeks, J., Heaphy, B. & Donovan, C. (2001). Same sex intimacies: Families of choice and other life experiments. Psychology Press.
64.
Wolf, N. (2001). Misconceptions. Truth, lies and the unexpected on the journey to motherhood, London: Chatto & Windus.
| ISSN: | 1640-1808 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
