PL EN
RESEARCH PAPER
Exploring the content of blindness rehabilitation programs in Lithuania: models and approaches
 
More details
Hide details
1
Public Administration, Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania
 
2
Public Administration and Political Sciences, Klaipeda University, Lithuania
 
 
Submission date: 2023-07-24
 
 
Final revision date: 2023-12-13
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-12-18
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-09-13
 
 
Publication date: 2024-09-13
 
 
Corresponding author
Jaroslav Dvorak   

Public Administration and Political Sciences, Klaipeda University, S.Neries 5, 105-3, 92294, Klaipeda, Lithuania
 
 
Problemy Polityki Społecznej 2024;66(3):1-22
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The field of research on blind and visually impaired services is broad, diverse, and dominated by empirical and interdisciplinary research. This is determined by the object under study, which includes a whole range of services, starting with social services and ending with personal health. On the other hand, the achievements of ophthalmologists in this field (compared to scientists in other fields) are significantly higher. However, it is noticeable in academic studies that NGOs must be professional and ready to provide more complex social services (research reveals that NGOs provide these services to the blind and partially sighted in about half of the world's countries). This article aims to conceptualize the social rehabilitation policy, legal regulation and models of the blind and visually impaired in Lithuania. Scientific and expert literature analysis, semi-structured interviews and case studies are used to achieve the goal. The current research found out that a gradual development of services is necessary to increase the availability and effectiveness of rehabilitation services for blind and partially sighted persons. It is necessary to ensure the expansion of the service system to achieve the interoperability of health and social services. Systematic monitoring and evaluation become important to ensure the quality of such services.
REFERENCES (58)
1.
Basilious, A., Basilious, A., Mao, A., & Hutnik, C. M. (2019). Trends in low vision care provided by ophthalmologists in Ontario between 2009 and 2015. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 54(2), 229-236.
 
2.
Binns, A. M., Bunce, C., Dickinson, C., Harper, R., Tudor-Edwards, R., Woodhouse, M., Margrain, T. H. (2012). How effective is low vision service provision? A systematic review. Survey of ophthalmology, 57(1), 34-65.
 
3.
Bright, T., Wallace, S., & Kuper, H. (2018). A systematic review of access to rehabilitation for people with disabilities in low-and middle-income countries. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(10), 2165.
 
4.
Colorafi, K. J., Evans, B. (2016). Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 9(4), 16-25.
 
5.
Cruess, A. F., Gordon, K. D., Bellan, L., Mitchell, S., & Pezzullo, M. L. (2011). The cost of vision loss in Canada. 2. Results. Canadian journal of ophthalmology, 46(4), 315-318.
 
6.
Dvorak, J. (2013). Exploring the Personalization of Public Services. Public Administration Review, 73(2), 378–380.
 
7.
EBU (European Blind Assocciation) (2018). Implementing standards for low vision services in Europe. https://www.euroblind.org/site....
 
8.
Erlandsson, S., Storm, P., Stranz, A., Szebehely, M., & Trydegård, G. B. (2013). Marketising trends in Swedish eldercare: competition, choice and calls for stricter regulation. Stockholm university Press, p.23-85.
 
9.
Fontenot, J. L., Bona, M. D., Kaleem, M. A., McLaughlin, W. M., Jr, M. A., Schwartz, T. L., ... & Jackson, M. L. (2018). American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern Vision Rehabilitation Committee. Vision Rehabilitation preferred practice pattern. Ophthalmology, 125(1), P228-P278.
 
10.
Fraser, S., Beeman, I., Southall, K., & Wittich, W. (2019). Stereotyping as a barrier to the social participation of older adults with low vision: a qualitative focus group study. BMJ open, 9(9), e029940.
 
11.
Greve, C. (2007). Contracting for public services. Routledge.
 
12.
Hodge, G. A. (2018). Privatization: An international review of performance. Routledge.
 
13.
Jaiswal, A., Santhakumaran, S., Walker, S., Sukhai, M. A., Packer, T., & Kessler, D. (2021). A scoping review of vision rehabilitation services in Canada. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 02646196211029344.
 
14.
Kaldenberg, J. (2019). Low vision rehabilitation services: Perceived barriers and facilitators to access for older adults with visual impairment. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 82(8), 466-474.
 
15.
Kekez, A., Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2018). Varieties of collaboration in public service delivery. Policy Design and Practice, 1(4), 243-252.
 
16.
Lam, N., & Leat, S. J. (2013). Barriers to accessing low-vision care: the patient’s perspective. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 48(6), 458-462.
 
17.
LASS. (2021). Veiklos ataskaita, 2020m. LASS XXXII suvažiavimui, https://lass.lt/wp-content/upl....
 
18.
LASS. (2022b). Kompleksinių socialinės reabilitacijos paslaugų teikimo ataskaita, 2022.10.05.
 
19.
LASS. (2022c). Veiklos ataskaita, 2021m. LASS XXXIV suvažiavimui, https://lass.lt/wp-content/upl... Latvijoje –siekiamybė Lietuvoje, LASS vizito Latvijos aklųjų sąjungoje ataskaita, p.1-3.
 
20.
LASS. (2022d). Informacinis pranešimas: Startuoja bandomoji mobiliųjų komandų paslauga – techninės pagalbos priemonės žmonėms su negalia tiesiai į namus, 2022-01-20, https://lass.lt/2022/01/20/sta....
 
21.
Lehane, C. M., Dammeyer, J., & Elsass, P. (2017). Sensory loss and its consequences for couples’ psychosocial and relational wellbeing: an integrative review. Aging & mental health, 21(4), 337-347.
 
22.
Lehane, C. M., Nielsen, T., Wittich, W., Langer, S., & Dammeyer, J. (2018). Couples coping with sensory loss: A dyadic study of the roles of self‐and perceived partner acceptance. British journal of health psychology, 23(3), 646-664.
 
23.
Loeffler, E. (2015). Co-production of public services and outcomes. In Public management and governance. Routledge.
 
24.
Longo, F., Saramago, P., Weatherly, H., Rabiee, P., Birks, Y., Keding, A., & Sbizzera, I. (2020). Cost-effectiveness of in-house versus contracted-out vision rehabilitation services in England. Journal of Long-term Care, 2020, 118-130.
 
25.
LR SOCMIN (2022). Slaugos ir priežiūros (pagalbos) išlaidų tikslinės kompensacijos https://socmin.lrv.lt/lt/veikl... [2022-11-16].
 
26.
LR SOCMIN. (2017). Ministro įsakymas dėl kompleksinių socialinės reabilitacijos paslaugų akliesiems teikimo tvarkos aprašo patvirtinimo. 2017-05-15,. A1-249.
 
27.
LR SOCMIN. (2020). Ministro įsakymas „Dėl neįgaliųjų socialinės integracijos 2021-2023 metų veiksmų plano patvirtinimo“, 2020-09-08, Nr. 18874.
 
28.
LR SOCMIN. (2021). Ministro įsakymas „Dėl Socialinės reabilitacijos paslaugų neįgaliesiems teikimo bendruomenėje projektų atrankos konkurso organizavimo 2022 metais nuostatų patvirtinimo“, 2021-09-27, Nr. 20163.
 
29.
LRS (Lietuvos Respublikos seimas). (2022). Aklųjų ir silpnaregių reabilitacijos tvarka atskirose Europos Sąjungos valstybėse narėse, Informacijos ir komunikacijos departamento tyrimų skyriaus, Analitinė apžvalga, Nr. 22/14.
 
30.
LRS. (1991). Lietuvos Respublikos neįgaliųjų socialinės integracijos įstatymas, Galiojanti redakcija, 2022-09-01 - 2022-12-31, I-2044.
 
31.
LRS. (2010). Įstatymas dėl Jungtinių Tautų Neįgaliųjų teisių konvencijos ir jos Fakultatyvaus protokolo ratifikavimo, 2010-05-27, Nr. 67-3350.
 
32.
LRS. (2020). Nutarimas dėl Aštuonioliktosios Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės programos patvirtinimo, Aštuonioliktosios Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės programa, 2020-12-11, Nr. 27121.
 
33.
LRV. (2021). Nutarimas dėl Vyriausybės programos nuostatų įgyvendinimo plano patvirtinimo, 2021.03.10, Nr. 155, https://www.e-tar.lt/portal/lt....
 
34.
Luu, W., Kalloniatis, M., Bartley, E., Tu, M., Dillon, L., Zangerl, B., & Ly, A. (2020). A holistic model of low vision care for improving vision‐related quality of life. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 103(6), 733-741.
 
35.
Markowitz, S. N. (2016). State-of-the-art: low vision rehabilitation. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 51(2), 59-66.
 
36.
Matti, A. I., Pesudovs, K., Daly, A., Brown, M., & Chen, C. S. (2011). Access to low‐vision rehabilitation services: barriers and enablers. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 94(2), 181-186.
 
37.
McMullin, C. (2022). Non-profit Organizations and Co-production: The Logics Shaping Professional and Citizen Collaboration. Taylor & Francis.
 
38.
Mogk, L. G. (2016). Re: State-of-the-art: low vision rehabilitation, S. Markowitz, Vol. 51, No. 2, April 2016. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 51(6), 494.
 
39.
OECD. (2015). Integrating Social Services for Vulnerable Groups: Bridging Sectors for Better Service Delivery, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/978926....
 
40.
Park, S. (2020). Beyond patient-centred care: a conceptual framework of co-production mechanisms with vulnerable groups in health and social service settings. Public Management Review, 22(3), 452-474.
 
41.
Patty, N. J., Koopmanschap, M., & Holtzer-Goor, K. (2018). A cost-effectiveness study of ICT training among the visually impaired in the Netherlands. BMC ophthalmology, 18(1), 1-10.
 
42.
Petersen, O. H., Hjelmar, U., & Vrangbæk, K. (2018). Is contracting out of public services still the great panacea? A systematic review of studies on economic and quality effects from 2000 to 2014. Social Policy & Administration, 52(1), 130-157.
 
43.
Rabiee, P., Parker, G. M., Bernard, S. M., & Baxter, K. (2015). Vision rehabilitation services: what is the evidence? Final report.
 
44.
Rapley, T. (2014). Sampling strategies in qualitative research. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis, Sage, 49-63.
 
45.
Ravenscroft, J. (2019). Introduction and synthesis of themes: The editor’s perspective. In The Routledge Handbook of Visual Impairment (pp. 1-7). Routledge.
 
46.
Ryan, B. (2014). Models of low vision care: past, present and future. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 97(3), 209-213.
 
47.
Sturgess, G. L. (2018). Public service commissioning: Origins, influences, and characteristics. Policy Design and Practice, 1(3), 155-168.
 
48.
Swift, A., Hong, Y., & Schreiber, C. (2021). A review of current low vision services in Alberta. J Clin Ophthalmol 2021; 5 (1): 341-346. J Clin Ophthalmol 2020 Volume 4 Issue 4, 3-42.
 
49.
Valstybės kontrolė. (2020). Asmenų su negalia socialinė integracija. 2020.09.07, Nr.VAE-9, https://www.valstybeskontrole.....
 
50.
van Nispen, R. M., Virgili, G., Hoeben, M., Langelaan, M., Klevering, J., Keunen, J. E., & van Rens, G. H. (2020). Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (1).
 
51.
Virgili, G., Parravano, M., Petri, D., Maurutto, E., Menchini, F., Lanzetta, P., ... & Lucenteforte, E. (2022). The Association between Vision Impairment and Depression: A Systematic Review of Population-Based Studies. Journal of clinical medicine, 11(9), 2412.
 
52.
VšĮ „Valakupių reabilitacijos centro“ (2022) 2021 m. veiklos ataskaita, http://www.reabilitacija.lt/wp....
 
53.
VšĮ „Valakupių reabilitacijos centro“ (2022b) 2021 m. finansinių ataskaitų rinkinio aiškinamasis raštas, http://www.reabilitacija.lt/wp....
 
54.
VšĮ „Vilties žiedas“ (2022) Paaiškinamasis raštas prie 2021 m. finansinių ataskaitų, https://www.viltiesziedas.lt/u....
 
55.
VšĮ „Vilties žiedas“ (2022) Veiklos ataskaita už 2021 m., https://www.viltiesziedas.lt/u....
 
56.
Wallace, S., Alao, R., Kuper, H., & Jackson, M. L. (2022). Multidisciplinary visual rehabilitation in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Disability and rehabilitation, 44(8), 1164-1175.
 
57.
Wollmann, H. (2018). The provision of public and personal social services in European countries: Between marketisation and the return of the public/municipal and third sector. In The Routledge Handbook of International Local Government (pp. 247-260). Routledge.
 
58.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Sage.
 
ISSN:1640-1808
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top