| ISSN: | 1640-1808 |
CASE REPORT
Paradigm shift towards co-production
in the European healthcare? A literature review
1
Public Administration Research Unit
Faculty of Law and Administration
University of Warsaw
Publication date: 2020-05-22
Corresponding author
Dawid Sześciło
Public Administration Research Unit, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warsaw, Oboźna 6/8, 00-332 Warsaw; author’s internet address: dawid.szescilo@uw.edu.pl
Public Administration Research Unit, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warsaw, Oboźna 6/8, 00-332 Warsaw; author’s internet address: dawid.szescilo@uw.edu.pl
Problemy Polityki Społecznej 2017;38:77-88
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Public service delivery has never been the area of a state monopoly, but the process of
the “destatization” of public service delivery accelerated with the wave of new public
management (NPM). The competition between private suppliers of public services was
expected to reduce public expenditures and improve the quality of services. However,
current scepticism towards NPM triggered the revival of the idea of co-production, i.e.
direct participation of citizens in public service delivery. This paper reviews the practices
of co-production in European health care systems. It is based on an extensive definition
of co-production, not only including co-delivery, but also co-planning, co-financing and co-
-evaluation. The existing evidence regarding the effects of co-production is also reviewed.
FUNDING
This paper was prepared within the framework of the research project “The promises of
decentralization in health care” funded by the National Centre of Science under contract no. UMO-
-2013/11/B/HS5/03896.
REFERENCES (42)
1.
Alakeson, V., Bunnin, A., Miller, C. (2013). Coproduction of health and wellbeing outcomes: the new paradigm for effective health and social care. London: OPM.
2.
Alston, C. et al. (2014). Shared Decision-Making Strategies for Best Care: Patient Decision Aids. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies: Discussion Paper.
3.
Anderson, R.M., Funnell, M.M. (2010). Patient Empowerment: Myths and Misconceptions. Patient Education and Counseling, no. 79(3), p. 277–282.
4.
Bährer-Kohler, S., Krebs-Roubicek, E., Ephraim-Oluwanuga, O. (2009). Self-management programs. In: S. Bährer-Kohler (ed.), Self-Management of Chronic Disease: Alzheimer’s Disease. Heidelberg: Springer Medizin Verlag, p. 79–98.
5.
Bartenberger, M., Sześciło, D. (2016). The Benefits and Risks of Experimental Co-production: The Case of Urban Redesign in Vienna. Public Administration, no. 94(2), p. 509–525.
6.
Barzelay, M., Armajani, B. (1992). Breaking Through Bureaucracy: A New Vision for Managing in Government. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
Batalden, M. et al. (2015). Coproduction of healthcare service. BMJ Quality and Safety. Online: doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004315 [access: 31.08.2016].
8.
Bieber, C. et al. (2009). Training physicians in shared decision-making — Who can be reached and what is achieved? Patient Education and Counselling, no. 77, p. 48–54.
9.
Bujan, P.A. et al. (2015). Expert Patient Programme Catalonia: a person-centered community perspective. International Journal of Integrated Care. Annual Conference Supplement.
10.
Carrier, J. (2009). Managing Long-term Conditions and Chronic Illness in Primary Care: A Guide to Good Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
11.
Christensen, T., Lægreid, P. (2002). New public management: Puzzles of democracy and the influence of citizens. Journal of Political Philosophy, no. 10(3), p. 267–295.
12.
Cordier, J.-F. (2014). The expert patient: towards a novel definition. European Respiratory Journal, no. 44, p. 853–857.
13.
DeLeon, L. (2005). Public Management, Democracy, and Politics. In: E. Ferlie, L.E. Lynn, C. Pollitt (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 103–130.
14.
Duffy, S. (2012). Peer Power. An Evaluation of the Personalisation Forum Group — a User-Led Organisation (ULO) for People in Doncaster. London: The Center for Welfare Reform.
15.
Elwyn, G. et al. (2010). Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ, no. 341 (November).
16.
Elwyn, G., Tilburt, J., Montori, V.M. (2013). The ethical imperative for shared decision-making. European Journal for Person Centered Healthcare, no. 1(1), p. 129–131.
17.
Galdas, P. et al. (2014). The accessibility and acceptability of self-management support interventions for men with long term conditions: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. BMC Public Health, no. 14(1230), p. 1–20.
18.
Greenhalgh, T. (2009). Chronic illness: beyond the expert patient. BMJ, no. 338 (March), p. 629–631.
19.
Greenhalgh, T., Howick, J., Maskrey N. (2014). Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? BMJ, no. 348, p. 1–7. Innovation Unit (2014). Inspiring Healthcare: Croydon Service Users Network. Online: http://www.innovationunit.org/... [access: 31.08.2016].
20.
Greitens, T.J., Strachan, J.C. (2014). Citizen deliberation in prospective public management: recognizing its value, overcoming its challenges. In: C. Conteh, T.J. Greitens, D.J. Jesuit, I. Roberge (eds.), Governance and Public Management: Strategic Foundations for Volatile Times. Abingdon: Routledge, p. 117–130.
21.
Haslbeck, J. (2015). Introducing the chronic disease self- management program in Switzerland and other German-speaking countries: findings of a cross-border adaptation using a multiple-methods approach. BMC Health Services Research, no. 15(576), p. 1–19.
22.
Heinrich, E. et al. (2012). Evaluation of the web-based Diabetes Interactive Education Programme (DIEP) for patients with type 2 diabetes. Patient Education and Counselling, no. 86, p. 172–178.
23.
Joseph-Williams, N., Edwards, A., Elwyn, G. (2014). Power imbalance prevents shared decision making. BMJ, no. 348, p. 1–3.
24.
Loh, A., Simon, D., Kriston, L., Härter, M. (2007). Shared Decision-Making in Medicine. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, no. 104(21), p. 1483–1488.
25.
Marschall, M.J. (2004). Citizen participation and the neighborhood context: A new look at the coproduction of local public goods. Political Research Quarterly, no. 57(2), p. 231–244.
26.
Martinez, J.M., Richardson, W.D. (2008). Administrative Ethics in the Twenty-first Century. Nowy Jork: Peter Lang Publishing.
27.
Nesta (2012). People Powered. Health Co-Production Catalogue. London: Nesta Operating Company.
28.
NHS (2012). Measuring Shared Decision Making. A review of research evidence. London: Capita Group Plc.
29.
NHS (2013). Your Health — Your Decision. Evaluation & Output Report of the AQuA Workstream within the National Shared Decision Making Programme. Salford: Advancing Quality Alliance.
30.
Office for Public Management (2013). The MAGIC programme: evaluation. An independent evaluation of the MAGIC (Making good decisions in collaboration) improvement programme. London: The Health Foundation.
31.
Ortega, M.G. (2010). The Expert Patient Programme in Catalonia. Health Policy Monitor, no. 16.
32.
Oshima, Lee E., Emanuel, E.J. (2013). Shared Decision Making to Improve Care and Reduce Costs. NEJM, no. 368(1), p. 6–7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1209500.
33.
Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic practice and action research, no. 24(5), p. 413–427.
34.
Parks, R.B., Baker, P.C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S., Vandivort, M., Whitaker, G., Wilson, R. (1981). Consumers as coproducers of public services: Some economic and institutional considerations. Policy Studies Journal, no. 9(7), p. 1001–1011.
35.
Rogers, A. et al. (2008). The United Kingdom Expert Patients Programme: results and implications from a national evaluation. Medical Journal of Australia, no. 189(10), S21–S24.
36.
Shafir, A., Rosenthal, J. (2012). Shared Decision Making: Advancing Patient Centered Care Through State and Federal Implementation. Portland-Washington: National Academy for State Health Policy.
37.
Stacey, D. et al. (2014). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 1.
38.
Tattersall, R. (2002). The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management for the twenty-first century. Clinical Medicine, no. 2(3), p. 227–229.
39.
The Health Foundation (2012). Co-Creating Health. Evaluation of first phase. London: The Health Foundation.
40.
Turner, A., Anderson, J.K., Wallace, L.M., Bourne, C. (2015). An evaluation of a self-management program for patients with long-term conditions. Patient Education and Counselling, no. 98, p. 213–219.
41.
Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2009). Building Strong Nations: Improving Governability and Public Management. Abingdon: Routledge.
42.
Whitaker, G.P. (1980). Coproduction: Citizen participation in service delivery. Public Administration Review, no. 40 (May/June), p. 240–246.
| ISSN: | 1640-1808 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
