CASE REPORT
The Northern Path. Some Remarks on the Nordic Way
of Development
More details
Hide details
1
Instytut Polityki Społecznej
Uniwersytet Warszawski
Publication date: 2020-06-05
Problemy Polityki Społecznej 2005;8:13-30
ABSTRACT
In the first part of the article the author points out the outstanding performance of the
Nordic countries in comparison to other countries (not only EU memeber states) on a very
wide range of economic and social indicators: growth, labour productivity, research and
development investment, liberalised product and service markets, rates of employment, welfare
benefits, physical and social infrastructure. The development of the Nordic states since at least
mid-1990s has shown that they have managed to create socially generous and even societies
as well as highly competitive, flexible and efficient ones. Therefore, the latest Scandinavian
experiences appear to have gone beyond the simplistic debate over liberalisation versus
protectionism, or free market capitalism versus the welfare state, which is so prevalent in
Europe today.
The article argues that the Nordic social model could become an important source of
inspiration for other countries in Europe, including Poland, despite its specifity based on
a number of cultural, historical and regional factors connected with Scandinavia. Among the
major lessons which can be learned about the Nordic model are the following observations. It
is not the size of the state which matters, but its quality. The public sector and institutionalized
social dialogue can be very effective instruments for economic and social reform. One of the
distinctive features of the Nordic countries is the strategy of „flexicurity” – combination of
flexible regulation, strongly developed systems of social security for the unemployed and an
active labour market policy. A further reason for the success is a high level of investment in
education and reasearch. Last but not least, Nordic governments are leading the way in
establishing a high degree of coherence between economic, social and ecological policies.
REFERENCES (43)
1.
Anioł W., Europejska polityka społeczna. Implikacje dla Polski, Aspra-Jr, Warszawa 2003.
2.
Anioł W., Paradoksy globalizacji, Aspra-Jr, Warszawa 2002.
3.
Becker E., Scandinavian Economies Thrive Despite High Taxes, „International Herald Tribune” z 14 października 2004.
4.
Bondevik, Norwegia pozostanie państwem opiekuńczym (wywiad P. Zychowicza z K.M. Bondevikiem), „Rzeczpospolita” z 15 października 2004.
5.
Edvardsen T., Hagvet B. (red.), Nordycki model państwa i dobrobytu, PWN, Warszawa 1994.
6.
Elvander N., The Labour Market Regimes in the Nordic Countries: A Comparative Analysis, „Scandinavian Political Studies” nr 2/2002.
7.
Esping-Andersen G., The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1990.
8.
Esping-Andersen G., Towards the Good Society, Once Again?, (w:) idem i in., Why We Need a New Welfare State, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2002.
9.
Geyer R., Ingebritsen C., Moses J.W. (red.), Globalization, Europeanization and the End of Scandinavian Social Democracy?, Routledge, London–New York 2000.
10.
Grynkiewicz T., Musimy goniç Skandynawi´, „Gazeta Wyborcza” z 27 kwietnia 2005.
11.
Hansen L., Waever O. (red.), European Integration and National Identity. The Challenge of the Nordic States, London–New York 2002.
12.
IHT, Nordic Gender Gap Is Thinner, „International Herald Tribune” z 17 maja 2005.
13.
Jochem S., Nordic Labour Market Policies in Transition, „West European Politics” nr 3/2000.
14.
Kautto M. i in., Nordic Social Policy: Changing Welfare States, Routledge, London–New York 1999.
15.
Kautto M. i in., Nordic Welfare States in the European Context, Routledge, London–New York 2001.
16.
Kettunen P., The Nordic Model and the Making of the Competitive „Us”, (w:) The Global Economy, Nation-states and the Regulation of Labour, Routledge, London–New York 1999.
17.
Kettunen P., The Notion of Nordic Model as a Framework for Comparative Knowledge, (w:) J. Marjanen i in. (red.), Research on the Study of the Nordic Welfare State, Renvall Institute, Helsinki 2004.
18.
Księżpolski M., Systemy zabezpieczenia społecznego w krajach nordyckich, Instytut Pracy i Spraw Socjalnych, Warszawa 1988.
19.
Kuczyński W., Bez realnego podkładu, „Rzeczpospolita” z 21 października 2004.
20.
Kuhnle S., The Scandinavian Welfare State in the 1990s: Challenged but Viable, (w:) M. Ferrera, M. Rhodes (red.), Recasting European Welfare States, Frank Cass Publishers, London 2000.
21.
Lundberg U., Aemark K., Social Rights and Social Security: The Swedish Welfare State 1900–2000, „Scandinavian Journal of History” nr 26/2001.
22.
Majcherek J.M., Wzorce, które tłamszà, „Rzeczpospolita” z 25 października 2004.
23.
Miettinen R., National Innovation System: Scientific Concept or Political Rhetoric, Edita, Helsinki 2002.
24.
Mitraszewska A., Lekcje płynące ze Szwecji, „Gazeta Wyborcza” z 22 listopada 2004.
25.
Moravcsik A., Koniec mitu Ameryki, „Newsweek” z 13 lutego 2005.
26.
Niklewicz K., Szczyt troch´ bardziej gospodarczy, „Gazeta Wyborcza” z 25 marca 2004.
27.
Niklewicz K., Polak, Fin – dwa bratanki? (rozmowa z R. Valo i B. Sosnowskim), „Gazeta Wyborcza” z 26 kwietnia 2004a.
28.
Niklewicz K., Duƒczycy stawiajà na wiedz´, „Gazeta Wyborcza” z 25 października 2004b.
29.
Persson G., Wywiad P. Cegielskiego z G. Perssonem, „Gazeta Wyborcza” z 12–13 czerwca 1999.
30.
Power J., Sweden’s success story has lessons for the world, „International Herald Tribune” z 12 sierpnia 2004.
31.
Power J., Sweden: in defense of the welfare state, „International Herald Tribune” z 24 sierpnia 2005.
32.
Praczyk G., Najsłabsi wśród najlepszych, „Rzeczpospolita” z 7 września 2005.
33.
Rifkin J., The European Dream: How Europe’s Vision of the Future is Quietly Eclipsing the American Dream, Tarcher, New York 2004.
34.
Rojas M., Beyond the Welfare State: Sweden and the Quest for a Post-Industrial Welfare Model, Timbro AB, Stockholm 2001.
35.
Sachs J.D., The Best Countries of the World, „Newsweek” nr 26/2004.
36.
Sadowski G., Unia nordycka, „Wprost” z 17 października 2004.
37.
Saxonberg S., Model szwedzki ma si´ dobrze, „Problemy Polityki Społecznej” nr 7/2004.
38.
Sołtyk R., Polki lepsze od Włoszek, Greczynek, Hiszpanek..., „Gazeta Wyborcza” z 18 maja 2005.
39.
Szomburg J., Dobrze, ˝e jest w ogóle strategia, „Rzeczpospolita” z 5–6 marca 2005.
40.
Szomburg J., Potrzeba rekolekcji narodowych, „Rzeczpospolita” z 10 marca 2005a.
41.
„The Nordic Welfare States. Programme for Denmark’s Chairmanship of the Nordic Council of Ministers” (2000) [maszynopis].
42.
Walat T., Cieśnina krzemowa, „Polityka” nr 48/2004.
43.
Walewska D., Polska nie jest konkurencyjna, „Rzeczpospolita” z 14 października 2004.