| ISSN: | 1640-1808 |
CASE REPORT
Conditional cash transfers in Latin America:
An attempt of evaluation
1
Centrum Studiów Latynoamerykańskich CESLA
Uniwersytet Warszawski
Publication date: 2020-05-22
Corresponding author
Joanna Gocłowska-Bolek
Centrum Studiów Latynoamerykańskich (CESLA), Uniwersytet Warszawski, ul. Smyczkowa 14, 02-678 Warszawa; adres elektroniczny autorki: j.goclowska-bolek@uw.edu.pl
Centrum Studiów Latynoamerykańskich (CESLA), Uniwersytet Warszawski, ul. Smyczkowa 14, 02-678 Warszawa; adres elektroniczny autorki: j.goclowska-bolek@uw.edu.pl
Problemy Polityki Społecznej 2017;38:59-76
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Latin America is on its way of transition from the system which strenghtens existing inequalities and privileges for selected social groups inherited from generation to generation,
into the system supporting sustainable development of the whole society. Currently, the
governments of Latin American countries, regardless of their political orientation, are
becoming increasingly aware that without social and cultural change, sustainable economic development cannot be ensured. It was in Latin America, a number of innovative
programs aimed in reducing social inequalities, breaking the circle of poverty and crime,
stimulating entrepreneurship and creativity of people were introduced. The pursuit of
modernity and innovation began just from social changes affecting the change of consciousness of citizens as well as of political elites. One of the main tools of social innovation in
Latin America are Conditional Cash Transfers (CCT). In the article the author attempts
to evaluate these programs.
REFERENCES (40)
1.
Aber, L., Rawlings, L.B. (2011). North-South knowledge sharing on incentive-based conditional cash transfer programs. SP Discussion Paper No. 1101. Washington: World Bank, s. 1–28.
2.
Agis, E., Cañ ete, C., Panigo, D. (2010). El impacto de la Asignació n Universal por Hijo en Argentina. Pobrano z: http://www.trabajo.gov.ar/left... [dostęp: 11.12.2016].
3.
Cecchini, S. (2014). Educació n, programas de transferencias condicionadas y protecció n social en Amé rica Latina y el Caribe. W: M. del Carmen Feijoó , M. Poggi (red.), Educació n y polí ticas sociales: sinergias para la inclusió n, s. 49–85. Buenos Aires: International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP UNESCO.
4.
Cecchini, S., Vargas, L.H. (2015). Estimating coverage, investment and poverty reduction impact of Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs) in Latin America and the Caribbean, paper presented at the Workshop “Measuring the social, economic and political effects of social protection: How to overcome the challenges?”. Bonn, Germany, 15–17 April.
5.
CEPAL (2016). Balance Preliminar de las Economías de América Latina y el Caribe 2016. Documento informative. Informes Anuales de la CEPAL. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.
7.
Colafranceschi, M., Vigorito, A. (2013). Uruguay: evaluació n de las polí ticas de transferencias. La estrategia de inclusió n y sus desafí os. W: R. Rofman (red.), Hacia un Uruguay má s equitativo. Los desafí os del sistema de protecció n social, s. 73–110. Montevideo: World Bank.
8.
Cruces, G., Gasparini, L. (2012). Polí ticas sociales para la reducció n de la desigualdad y la pobreza en Amé rica Latina y el Caribe. Diagnó stico, propuesta y proyecciones en base a la experiencia reciente. Argentina: Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
9.
ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean) (2015a). Economic Survey of Latin America, and the Caribbean, 2015 (LC/G.2645-P). Santiago de Chile: ECLAC.
10.
ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean) (2015b). Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean, 2015 (LC/G.2655-P). Santiago de Chile: ECLAC.
11.
ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean) (2015c). Inclusive social development: The next generation of policies for overcoming poverty and reducing inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean (LC.L/4056(CDS.1/3). Santiago de Chile: ECLAC.
12.
The Economist, How to children out of jobs and into school: Brasil’s Bolsa Familia (2010). Pobrane z: http://www.economist.com/node/... [dostęp: 10.03.2017].
13.
Ferranti, D. de, Perry, G.E., Ferreira, F.H.G., Walton, M. (2004). Inequality in Latin America: Breaking with History. Washington: World Bank.
14.
Fiszbein, A., Schady, N. (2009). Conditional cash transfers: Reducing present and future poverty. Washington: World Bank.
15.
Fukuyama, F. (1997). Zaufanie: kapitał społeczny a droga do dobrobytu. Warszawa/Wrocław: PWN.
16.
Glassman, A., Todd, J., Gaarder, M. (2007). Performance-based incentives for health: Conditional cash transfer programs in Latin America and the Carribean, CGD Working Paper No. 120. Washington: Center for Global Development (CGD).
17.
Gocłowska-Bolek, J. (2016). Nowa strategia rozwoju Ameryki Łacińskiej w dobie internacjonalizacji. Studia Ekonomiczne, nr 269, s. 74–87.
18.
Gocłowska-Bolek, J. (2015). Fostering economic and social innovativeness to address development challenges in Latin America. W: C. Pintilescu, B. Wierzbiń ski, G. Zarotiadis (red.), Openness, innovation, efficiency and democratization as preconditions for economic development, s. 201–209. Cracow: Cracow University of Economics.
19.
Gocłowska-Bolek, J. (2014). Innowacyjność gospodarcza i społeczna jako strategia rozwoju Ameryki Łacińskiej w perspektywie historycznej. Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne, t. XCII, s. 263–280.
20.
Hanlon, J., Barrientos, A., Hulme, D. (2010). Just give money to the poor: The development revolution from the Global South. Boulder: Kumarian Press.
21.
Hoddinott, J., Bassett, L. (2009). Conditional cash transfer programs and nutrition in Latin America: Assessment of impacts and strategies for improvement. Working Papers, No. 9. Santiago: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
22.
Londoño de la Cuesta, J.L. (1996). Poverty, ineaquality, and human capital development in Latin America 1950–2025. Washington: World Bank.
23.
Lustig, N., Pessino, C., Scott, J. (2013). The impact of taxes and social spending on inequality and poverty in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay: An overview. CEQ Working Paper, No. 13. Washington: CEQ.
24.
Martínez, R. et al. (2013). El impacto econó mico de las polí ticas sociales. Project Documents, ECLAC, No. 531 (LC/W.531). Santiago: ECLAC.
25.
Molina Millán, T., Barham, T., Macours, K., Maluccio, J., Stampini, M. (2016). Long-term impacts of conditional cash transfers in Latin America: Review of the evidence. IDB Working Papers Series No. IDB-WP-732. Washington: Inter-American Development Bank.
26.
Neri, M.C., Vaz, F.M., De Souza, P.H.G.F. (2013). Efeitos macroeconô micos do Programa Bolsa Famí lia: uma aná lise comparativa das transferê ncias sociais. W: T. Campello, M.C. Neri (red.), Programa Bolsa Famí lia: uma dé cada de inclusã o e cidadania, s. 193–206. Brasilia: Institute of Applied Economic Research (IEPA).
27.
OAS/ECLAC/ILO (Organization of American States/Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean/International Labour Organization) (2011). Protecció n social y generació n de empleo: aná lisis de experiencias derivadas de programas de transferencias con corresponsabilidad. Project Documents, No. 398 (LC/W.398). Santiago: ECLAC.
28.
OXFAM (2014). Tax systems in Latin America and the Caribbean work for the benefit of the elites. Pobrane z: https://www.oxfam.org/en/press... [dostęp: 01.12.2016].
29.
Osório, R.G. (2008). The recent impact of government transfers on poverty in Honduras and alternatives to enhance their effects. Working Paper, No. 47. Brasilia: International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG).
30.
Piotrowska, M. (2008). Znaczenie ochrony socjalnej dla efektywności gospodarczej. Nierówności społeczne a wzrost gospodarczy, nr 12, s. 211–222.
31.
Przewłocka, K. (2010). Zjawisko wyuczonej bezradności u klientów instytucji pomocy społecznej — przyczyny, konsekwencje i możliwości przeciwdziałania. W: M. Piorunek (red.), Pomoc — wsparcie społeczne — poradnictwo. Od teorii do praktyki, s. 191–207. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
32.
Putnam, R.D. (2008). Samotna gra w kręgle. Upadek i odrodzenie wspólnot lokalnych w Stanach Zjednoczonych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.
33.
Soares, S. (2012). Bolsa Famí lia, its design, its impacts and possibilities for the future. Working Paper, No. 89. Brasilia: International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG).
34.
Soares, F.V., Ribas, R.P., Osório, R.G. (2010). Evaluating the impact of Brazil’s Bolsa Família: Cash transfer programs in comparative perspective. Latin American Research Review, vol. 45, no. 2, s. 173–190.
35.
Stampini, M., Tornarolli, L. (2012). The growth of conditional cash transfers in Latin America and the Caribbean: Did they go too far? IZA Policy Paper No. 49. Bonn: IZA.
36.
Treanor, J. (2014). Richest 1% of people own nearly half of global wealth. The Guardian. Pobrane z: http://www.theguardian.com/bus... [dostęp: 02.03.2017].
37.
United Nations (2015). The millenium development goals report. New York: United Nations.
38.
United Nations Economic & Social Affairs (2013). Inequality matters: Report on the world social situation. New York: United Nations.
39.
World Bank (2014). A model from Mexico for the world. Pobrane z: http://www.worldbank.org/en/ne... [dostęp: 10.03.2017].
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| ISSN: | 1640-1808 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
