CASE REPORT
The application of the Life Course Perspective
in Social Policy and Social Work
More details
Hide details
1
Wydział Studiów Międzynarodowych i Politologicznych
Uniwersytet Łódzki
Publication date: 2020-05-25
Corresponding author
Kaja Zapędowska-Kling
Wydział Studiów Międzynarodowych i Politologicznych, Uniwersytet Łódzki, ul. Składowa 43,
90-127 Łódź; adres elektroniczny autorki: kaja.kling@gmail.com
Problemy Polityki Społecznej 2017;36:63-74
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Contemporary demographic changes and the ageing of populations pose the question on
how old age, as a stage of life, is shaped by preceding events, experiences and behaviors.
This article proposes to use the life course perspective in research on social policy and
social work, with a specific focus on ageing policies. It reviews selected areas of social
policy (such as labor market policy, social security policy, health policy, family policy, education policy, long-term care and others), in which the use of the life course perspective
may bring positive effects, such as establishing pro-active and preventive policy instruments. The dominant theoretical perspective used in the research is a new institutionalism
and, in particular, its sociological and normative streams. The article elaborates the process of life-course institutionalization and deinstitutionalization and emphasizes benefits
resulting from integrating the process of policy-making and new institutional solutions
with the input of gerontology, psychology, pedagogy and adult medicine.
REFERENCES (14)
1.
Bovenberg, A.L. (2007). The Life-Course Perspective and Social Policies: An Overview of the Issues, Modernising Social Policy for the New Life Course, OECD, s. 23–73.
2.
CBOS (2007). Między młodością i starością. Komunikat Centrum Badania Opinii Publicznej, Warszawa. Pobrano z:
http://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL... K_022_07.pdf [dostęp 28.03.2917].
3.
Dannefer, D. (2003). Cumulative Advantage/Disadvantage and the Life Course: Cross-Fertilizing Age and Social Science Theory. Journal of Gerontology, vol. 58(6), s. 327–337.
4.
Dannefer, D., Settersten Jr., R.A. (2010). The Study of the Life Course: Implications for Social Gerontology. W: D. Dannefer, Ch. Phillipson (red.) The Sage Handbook of Social Gerontology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, s. 3–19.
6.
Ferraro, K.F., Shippee, T.P., Schafer, M.H. (2009). Cumulative Inequality Theory for Research on Aging and the Life Course. W: V.L. Bengtson, M. Silverstein, N.M. Putney, D. Gans (red.) Handbook of Theories of Aging. New York: Springer, s. 413–433.
7.
Hutchison, E.D. (2011). A Life Course Perspective. W: E.D. Hutchison (red.) Dimensions of Human Behavior. The Changing Life Course. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, s. 3–37.
8.
Kohli, M. (2007). The Institutionalization of the Life Course. Research in Human Development, vol. 4(3/4), s. 253–271.
9.
Mayer, K.U. (2009). New Directions in Life Course Research. Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 35, s. 413–433.
10.
Merton, R.K. (1988). The Matthew Effect in Science II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property. Isis, vol. 79(4), s. 606–623. Szarfenberg, R. (2008). Nowe wyzwanie — gospodarowanie czasem życia. Dialog. Pismo Dialogu Społecznego, nr 2, s. 81–84.
11.
Szatur-Jaworska, B. (2016). Polityka społeczna wobec starzenia się ludności — propozycja konceptualizacji pojęcia, Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia, vol. 4(9), s. 7–27.
12.
Światowa Organizacja Zdrowia, International Longevity Centre (2000). The Implications for Training of Embracing a Life Course Approach to Health, Hertfordshire. Pobrano z:
http://www.who.int/ageing/publ.... pdf [dostęp 28.03.2917].
13.
Wealleans, L. (2013). A Life Course Approach to Promoting Positive Ageing. The Beth Johnson Foundation. Pobrano z:
http://www.scie-socialcareonli... [dostęp 28.03.2917].
14.
Wóycicka, I. (2004). Wprowadzenie. W: I. Wóycicka (red.) Później na emeryturę?. Gdańsk: Instytut Badań nad Gospodarką Rynkową, Gdańsk, s. 5–6.